The idea of definiteness implies the idea of equality: for if there could be one exact quantum, why couldn't there be two? Two equal quanta? Two identical photons, for instance? But two identical photons would have to have identical histories, i.e.: they would have to be the same. "Identity" presupposes sameness, and "something" (supposing there is such a thing as a "thing") can only be identical with itself - can only be equal to itself. Therefore, no two things can be identical; they can, at most, be similar. But similarity is, of course, a relative concept: all things are similar, in so far as they are "things", and no two things are equal, as long as they're not - the same.
Friday, March 30, 2007
Previous Posts
- "In physics, there is no broad consensus as to an ...
- You confuse being empathetic toward one's own peop...
- If I say "That glass is not empty", then what I'm ...
- Onlangs schreef ik het volgende op een Nietzschefo...
- Uit het voorgaande blijkt dat Heidegger in die ing...
- Ik schreef net het volgende aan een vriend, degene...
- Ziehier de aanzet tot een uitleg van een zin ...
- "In the beginning was the Unknown, to which humank...
- "Hoe ik de filosoof beschouw, als een verschrikkel...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home